|
articles
timelines
America
The World at large
links (opens in new window)
|
|
Aftermath and Reconstruction
- 1650 - the Jesuits and their Huron
flock quit Christian Island
- 1844 - Pierre Chazelle visits the site
and recommends its excavation to Rome
- 1852 - Rev. George Hallen maps the
site
- 1855 - Félix Martin, S.J. commissioned
by the province, excavates at the site for 2 weeks
- 1876 - Peter Burnet surveys the site
- 1878 - Prof. John Galbraith maps the
site
- 1940 - The Jesuit Order acquires the
site and initiates archaeological exploration
- 1941-43 - Kenneth Kidd excavates part of the north court
- 1946 - Lindsay Warrdell draws up blueprints
for the bastions, church and residence
- 1947-51 - Elsie and Wilfrid Jury of the University of Western
Ontario excavate current site
- 1952-54 - Father Denis Hegarty clarifies building outlines and
re-excavates St. Josephs church
- 1964-68 - Reconstruction of the mission directed by W. Jury,
the Jesuits and province
After the Jesuits fled the burning mission in 1649, they moved
to Christian Island and founded a second mission. This lasted only
a year before the Iroquois war drove them to retreat to Quebec.
For the next 150 years the land reverted to use by natives and the
occasional fur trader. Its reputation remained however, and Governor
Simcoe makes reference to the "French ruins supposed to be
the Church of Ste. Marys" in his Diary.
Into the 19th and 20th Centuries
The Jesuits' interest in Ste. Marie was renewed when in 1844 Pierre
Chazelle visited the ruins after becoming Superior of the Jesuits
in Canada. It was his idea that the site be excavated and rebuilt
and to this end, he wrote the Superior General in Rome.
Over the next century 4 surveys were done of the site, all of which
show the remains of stone fortifications with moats and earthworks
along the south side. By 1941 when Kenneth Kidd began his excavations
for the Jesuit Order, the trenches and earthworks had eroded. His
task was to clarify the outlines of the settlement, recover artefacts
for dating and interpretation, and collect whatever data was necessary
for reconstruction. Since reconstruction was always a consideration,
loose stones from the bastions and hearths were piled in low walls
for reuse.
By 1941, WWII was in full swing and only 3 seasons of fieldwork
were completed. The final report wouldn't be issued until 1949.
Despite this, in the aftermath of WWII, with the 5th centenary of
the destruction of Ste. Marie looming, the desire to rebuild the
mission was strong. The basis of the reconstruction would be
- The Jesuit's own records which held minimal descriptions of
the settlement. A few things were known: they spoke of new buildings:
the barn, hospital and church, for example. Christian converts
lived nearby and there were European gardens and graves to be
found
- Martin's 1855 survey had left the impression that land south
of the fort was set aside for native converts, and
- The results of Kidd's excavations which included a few significant
points: despite Martin's contentions, Kidd found no signs of occupation
in test pits dug south of the moat. To the west of the stone fortifications
he found hearths, trade goods and Indian artifacts that he thought
might date to 1649. To the north and east: nothing.
It should have been no surprise then that there was more to be
learned from the site. As it happened, when the stones set aside
to rebuild the bastions were moved, post moulds were uncovered,
suggesting a wooden palisade extending west from the southwest bastion.
Building came to a standstill and Wilfrid and Elsie Jury were hired
to continue excavations. Over the next 4 years, the Jurys excavated
first the north court, then the canal, the area between the canal
and cemetery and finally the area south of the cemetery The results
of their research were published in a short commercial book. Their
fieldnotes disappeared until 1994.
Among their findings, the Jurys established where wooden palisades
once stood. They found fireplaces and remnants of both European
and Indian buildings outside the area covered by Kidd and showed
that the mission was 5-6 times larger than indicated on previous
surveys and maps. By his research, Ste. Marie had "the first
cultivated farm lands, the first stables, and the remains of the
first domesticated animals in the province, predating permanent
settlement by two centuries." (Jury, 1954, p. 37). It was also
756 feet long, with a canal, double palisades, and European style
buildings with gables and stone chimneys, often two-storeyed with
deep sloping roofs and some glassed in windows. (Jury, 1954, p.109).
In 1952 Father Denis Hegarty took over as archaeologist. He delineated
building outlines and re-excavated St. Joseph church where he found
the original grave of Fathers Brébeuf and Lalemant. (The
Jesuits disinterred the bones when they abandoned Ste. Marie). The
grave was marked by a lead plaque engraved with Brébeuf's
name and the details of his death. Later excavations led him to
suggest that the church was a far more complicated building than
Jury supposed, containing 3 or 4 rooms.
WIth this, it was assumed that excavations were complete and reconstruction
could go ahead without disturbing hidden artefacts that would change
the interpretation of the site now in place.
Reinterpretations
It has been many decades since Ste. Marie among the Huron was reconstructed
in Midland ON. In that time, certain issues have been re-visited
- Jury's fieldnotes were found in 1994 and discrepancies between
these, his book and Kidd's notes have been studied. For example,
in their report, Tummon and Gray
note that Jury's fieldnotes show the evidence for Natives occupying
the south end of the site was "difficult to interpret".
- The problems of studying a site that has been modified by excavation
and new building has been considered and new excavations under-taken
- New models of native life before European contact have developed
- New thinking on the mission has been the result.
As just one example of how Jury's research has been re-evaluated,
Tummon and Gray note that in his book Jury cleaned up the palisade
so that it appeared to be a straight-forward double ring of wooden
posts. In his fieldnotes several lines of post moulds are recognized
as running south from St. Josephs Church and many of the posts are
smaller than the ones in the northern courts and were staggered,
suggesting they were native-built, possibly part of an Indian palisade
or longhouse.
In the 1990s, new excavations were undertaken. It is difficult
however to find undisturbed patches of land at the mission. Disturbed
land is land that has been changed by later visitors who may have
removed or added artefacts to the area, confusing the findings.
During the reconstruction, every effort was made to place new buildings
on top of older ones to make sure the site replicated its predecessor
exactly. This meant that the palisade post moulds and waterway were
completely dug up and rebuilt. Much of the land was dumped with
fill to build administrative offices, and trenches were dug for
building and drainage.
One recent finding is evidence that the site, rather than being
the result of a single, 10-year settlement, is part of a larger
site dating back to 1200AD. That is, Ste. Marie was actually just
one of many habitations in the area. Other settlements included
ancient campsites and modern farms. This makes the evidence much
more difficult to interpret. Not everything that was forced into
the 10 year timeframe necessarily belongs there. For example, the
ditch that starts inside the north court and which is interpreted
as a waterway, was not mentioned in 19th c. surveys and may be recent.
Our reconstruction follows that in Midland. It is based on Jury's
interpretation of the evidence he found, filtered through his knowledge
of the site and what must have seemed probable. For example, in
the southern court he found part of a wall that was similar to those
in the northern compound. Along with it were hand-made nails and
nearby was a hearth. He conjectured that these were the remains
of a hospital since the building was far from the Jesuit's residence
and would have been an acceptable place to care for native women
as well as men.
In all, the following questions have been raised:
- Did the Jesuits use the areas now set aside as Non-Christian
- Was there a Non-Christian longhouse at the time of the mission
- Was there a 5-sided bastion at the south end of the mission
- Was there an exterior double palisade around the Non-Christian
area or are the remains the result of a variety of palisades both
Huron and Iroquoian
- Could the "hospital" actually be based on a 19th c.
building
What we do know is that the following buildings existed:
- Mission house
- Private chapel
- Public church (1642)
- Hospital that women could access which means it was away from
the main settlement
- Forge
- Cemetery
- Hospice for Christian Hurons
- Temporary shelter for non-Christian natives where they could
hear the word
- Crosses at the 4 corners
- Boat ferry across the Wye
- Fields were cultivated
- Central location for mission providing shelter, food, and spiritual
instruction
- Many of the smaller missions were close enough they could be
visited without a sleep-over
- The French were practised in and knowledgeable about fortification
principles
|